| Title |
Selecting early-career researchers: the influence of discourses of internationalisation and excellence on formal and applied selection criteria in academia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Higher Education, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-018-0237-2 |
| Authors |
Channah Herschberg, Yvonne Benschop, Marieke van den Brink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 10 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 55% |
| Scientists | 18 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 36 | 36% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 14% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,209,305
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#97
of 1,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,462
of 337,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.