↓ Skip to main content

Vocalization as a novel endpoint of atypical attachment behavior in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-exposed infant mice

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Vocalization as a novel endpoint of atypical attachment behavior in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-exposed infant mice
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00204-018-2176-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eiki Kimura, Chiharu Tohyama

Abstract

Mammalian attachment behaviors, such as crying, are essential for infant survival by receiving food, protection, and warmth from caregivers. Ultrasonic vocalization (USV) of infant rodents functions to promote maternal proximity. Impaired USV emission has been reported in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder, suggesting that USV is associated with higher brain function. In utero and lactational dioxin exposure is known to induce higher brain function abnormalities in adulthood; however, whether perinatal dioxin exposure affects behavior during infancy is unclear. Therefore, we studied the impact of dioxin exposure on USV emission in infant mice born to dams treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD; 0.6 or 3.0 µg/kg) on gestational day 12.5. On postnatal days 3-9, USVs of the offspring were recorded for 1 min using a microphone in a sound-attenuated chamber. The total USV and mean call durations in infant mice exposed to 3.0 µg/kg, but not 0.6 µg/kg, were shorter than those in the control mice. In addition, the percentages of complicated call types (i.e., chevron and wave) in mice exposed to 3.0 µg/kg were decreased. Dioxin-induced gene expression changes occurred in the brains of mice exposed to 3.0 µg/kg; however, body weight, motor activity, and vocal fold structure were not significantly affected. These results suggest that infant USV is a useful behavioral endpoint in developmental neurotoxicity assessment that may be used to evaluate effects of chemical exposure on the infant-caregiver interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,016
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,119
of 446,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.