↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of the voltage-gated potassium channel KCNQ4 in the auditory pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of the voltage-gated potassium channel KCNQ4 in the auditory pathway
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00424-004-1366-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.-M. Chambard, J. F. Ashmore

Abstract

The potassium channel KCNQ4, expressed in the mammalian cochlea, has been associated tentatively with an outer hair cell (OHC) potassium current, I(K,n), a current distinguished by an activation curve shifted to exceptionally negative potentials. Using CHO cells as a mammalian expression system, we have examined the properties of KCNQ4 channels under different phosphorylation conditions. The expressed current showed the typical KCNQ4 voltage-dependence, with a voltage for half-maximal activation (V(1/2)) of -25 mV, and was blocked almost completely by 200 microM linopirdine. Application of 8-bromo-cAMP or the catalytic sub-unit of PKA shifted V(1/2) by approximately -10 and -20 mV, respectively. Co-expression of KCNQ4 and prestin, the OHC motor protein, altered the voltage activation by a further -15 mV. Currents recorded with less than 1 nM Ca(2+) in the pipette ran down slowly (12% over 5 min). Buffering the pipette Ca(2+) to 100 nM increased the run-down rate sevenfold. Exogenous PKA in the pipette prevented the effect of elevated [Ca(2+)](i) on run-down. Inhibition of the calcium binding proteins calmodulin or calcineurin by W-7 or cyclosporin A, respectively, also prevented the calcium-dependent rapid run-down. We suggest that KCNQ4 phosphorylation via PKA and coupling to a complex that may include prestin can lead to the negative activation and the negative resting potential found in adult OHCs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Mathematics 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#476
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,693
of 144,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them