↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Diversity, Site, and Host Specificity of Sea Turtle Blood Flukes (Digenea: Schistosomatoidea: Spirorchiidae): A Molecular Prospecting Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Parasitology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of Diversity, Site, and Host Specificity of Sea Turtle Blood Flukes (Digenea: Schistosomatoidea: Spirorchiidae): A Molecular Prospecting Study
Published in
Journal of Parasitology, August 2017
DOI 10.1645/16-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A Stacy, Phoebe A Chapman, Allen M Foley, Ellis C Greiner, Lawrence H Herbst, Alan B Bolten, Paul A Klein, Charles A Manire, Elliott R Jacobson

Abstract

Neospirorchis (Digenea: "Spirorchiidae") are blood flukes of sea turtles. Trematodes tentatively identified as Neospirorchis sp. infect various sites within sea turtles inhabiting waters of the southeastern United States, but efforts to obtain specimens adequate for morphologic study has proven difficult. Two genetic targets, the internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal RNA gene and the partial mitochrondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene, were used to investigate potential diversity among parasite specimens collected from stranded sea turtles. Sequence data were obtained from 215 trematode and egg specimens collected from 92 individual free-ranging cheloniid sea turtles comprising 4 host species. Molecular analysis yielded over 20 different genotypes. We were able to assign 1 genotype to 1 of the 2 recognized species, Neospirorchis pricei Manter and Larson, 1950. In many examples, genotypes exhibited host and site specificity. Our findings indicate considerable diversity of parasites resembling Neospirorchis with evidence of a number of uncharacterized blood flukes that require additional study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,589,085
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Parasitology
#2,187
of 2,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,548
of 330,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Parasitology
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.