↓ Skip to main content

Riemannian tori without conjugate points are flat

Overview of attention for article published in Geometric and Functional Analysis, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 178)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Riemannian tori without conjugate points are flat
Published in
Geometric and Functional Analysis, May 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01896241
Authors

D. Burago, S. Ivanov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#37
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,796
of 23,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them