↓ Skip to main content

Saliva as a medium to detect and measure biomarkers related to pain

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saliva as a medium to detect and measure biomarkers related to pain
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21131-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hajer Jasim, Anders Carlsson, Britt Hedenberg-Magnusson, Bijar Ghafouri, Malin Ernberg

Abstract

Saliva is often neglected as a body fluid of diagnostic or prognostic value, even though generally well accepted by the patients. This is due to lack of a standardized collection procedure. The aim of this study was to identify the ideal saliva collection technique and develop new sensitive methods to detect and analyse markers related to pain in healthy pain-free subjects. Plasma and five different saliva collection approached was evaluated during strictly controlled conditions. Levels of nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) were determined using novel western blotting based technology. Glutamate and substance P (SP) was determined using commercial available methods. Several new isoforms were found for NGF, CGRP and BDNF in saliva. The isoform pattern showed significant variation in both expression and chemiluminescence levels between different collection methods. New sensitive methods to study pain related markers in saliva were developed in this study. Furthermore, we are first to demonstrate a correlation between the Glutamate concentration in stimulated whole saliva and blood. However, the fundamental conclusion drawn is the importance of consistency in the collection method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Engineering 9 5%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 65 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,930,799
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#87,900
of 124,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,259
of 330,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,015
of 4,271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.