You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic revision of the mangrove genus Avicennia (Avicenniaceae) in Australasia*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian Systematic Botany, June 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1071/sb9910299 |
| Authors |
NC Duke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Systematic Botany
#95
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,942
of 16,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Systematic Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them