↓ Skip to main content

Complications of bone lengthening

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Complications of bone lengthening
Published in
International Orthopaedics, October 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00180230
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. Aquerreta, F. Forriol, J. Cañadell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 79%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#459
of 1,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,350
of 20,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them