| Title |
Wetland loss in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Multiple working hypotheses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, March 1997
|
| DOI | 10.2307/1352716 |
| Authors |
R. E. Turner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 50 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 15% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,734,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#69
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#600
of 29,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them