↓ Skip to main content

Male–Male Relationships in Lion-tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) and Bonnet Macaques (Macaca radiata)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Male–Male Relationships in Lion-tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) and Bonnet Macaques (Macaca radiata)
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10764-010-9448-9
Authors

Mewa Singh, Tephillah Jeyaraj, U. Prashanth, Werner Kaumanns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 52%
Environmental Science 14 17%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,386
of 99,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.