Title |
The biology of the golden hammerhead,Sphyrna tudes, off Trinidad
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Biology of Fishes, January 1989
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00001605 |
Authors |
José I. Castro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 26% |
Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 71% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#511
of 1,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,553
of 54,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them