↓ Skip to main content

Zoopharmacognosy

Overview of attention for article published in Resonance, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 256)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Zoopharmacognosy
Published in
Resonance, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12045-008-0038-5
Authors

Rajasekar Raman, Sripathi Kandula

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 47%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Resonance
#50
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,161
of 88,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resonance
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.