↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Targeted therapies for targeted populations: Anti-EGFR treatment for EGFR amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Targeted therapies for targeted populations: Anti-EGFR treatment for EGFR amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
Published in
Cancer Discovery, May 2018
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven B Maron, Lindsay Alpert, Heewon A Kwak, Samantha Lomnicki, Leah Chase, David Xu, Emily O'Day, Rebecca J Nagy, Richard B Lanman, Fabiola Cecchi, Todd Hembrough, Alexa Schrock, John Hart, Shu-Yuan Xiao, Namrata Setia, Daniel V T Catenacci

Abstract

Previous anti-EGFR trials in unselected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) patients were resoundingly negative. We identified EGFR amplification in 5% (19/363) of patients at the University of Chicago, including 6% (8/140) who were prospectively screened with intention-to-treat using anti-EGFR therapy. Seven pts received >1 dose of treatment: three first line FOLFOX plus ABT-806, one second line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, and three third/fourth line cetuximab alone. Treatment achieved objective response in 58% (4/7) and disease control in 100% (7/7) with a median progression-free survival of 10 months. Pre and post-treatment tumor NGS, serial plasma ctDNA NGS, and tumor IHC/FISH for EGFR revealed pre-existing and/or acquired genomic events including EGFR negative clones, PTEN deletion, KRAS amplification/mutation, NRAS, MYC and HER2 amplification, and GNAS mutations serving as mechanisms of resistance. Two evaluable patients demonstrated interval increase of CD3+ infiltrate, including one who demonstrated increased NKp46+, and PD-L1 IHC expression from baseline, suggesting an immune therapeutic mechanism of action. EGFR amplification predicted benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, albeit until various resistance mechanisms emerged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,112,909
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#568
of 4,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,266
of 337,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#14
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.