↓ Skip to main content

Identification of referencing and citation processes of scientific journals based on the citation distribution model

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Identification of referencing and citation processes of scientific journals based on the citation distribution model
Published in
Scientometrics, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0085-z
Authors

Guang Yu, Yi-Jun Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Croatia 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 30 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Librarian 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 29%
Computer Science 8 21%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,311
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,038
of 90,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.