↓ Skip to main content

Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding
Published in
Primates, October 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02380877
Authors

Elisabetta Visalberghi, Loredana Trinca

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Professor 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 42%
Psychology 24 24%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,135
of 14,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them