| Title |
Structural analysis of tool-use by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100710050034 |
| Authors |
G. C. Westergaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 49% |
| Psychology | 15 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,027
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,571
of 35,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them