↓ Skip to main content

Censusing primates by transect in a forest of known primate density

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, June 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Censusing primates by transect in a forest of known primate density
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, June 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02745499
Authors

Thomas R. Defler, Dilver Pintor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 5%
United States 3 3%
India 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 91 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 60%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,769
of 9,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them