↓ Skip to main content

Avian reproductive failure in response to an extreme climatic event

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Avian reproductive failure in response to an extreme climatic event
Published in
Oecologia, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1734-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas T. Bolger, Michael A. Patten, David C. Bostock

Abstract

Recently, climate change research has emphasized the potential increase in the frequency and severity of climatic extremes. We compared the reproductive effort and output among four species of passerine birds in coastal southern California, USA, a semi-arid region, during a normal precipitation year (2001) and the driest year in a 150-year climate record (2002). Both reproductive effort and output differed dramatically between years. Mean reproductive output among the four species was 2.37 fledglings/pair in 2001 and 88.4% of all pairs observed attempted at least one nest. The birds attempted a mean of 1.44 nests per pair and were successful in 47.7% of those attempts. In 2002, only 6.7% of the pairs even attempted a nest and only 1.8% were successful, for a total output of 0.07 fledglings per pair. The abundance of suitable arthropod prey items in the environment was also much lower in 2002, suggesting that low food availability was the proximal cause of the reproductive failure. The data for one of these species, the rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps), were combined with reproductive and rainfall data from a previous 3-year study (1997-1999) in the same sites. The combined data sets suggest that the response of reproduction to rainfall variation is linear, and that the low end of the precipitation range brings the population near reproductive failure. Any change in climate that would increase the frequency of extreme dry conditions would likely endanger populations of these species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Chile 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 186 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Student > Master 27 13%
Professor 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 57%
Environmental Science 41 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,901,379
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#990
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,446
of 58,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.