↓ Skip to main content

Fallen fruits stimulate decomposition of leaf litter of dominant species in NW Patagonia shrublands

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Fallen fruits stimulate decomposition of leaf litter of dominant species in NW Patagonia shrublands
Published in
Plant and Soil, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11104-018-3590-0
Authors

Manuel de Paz, Miriam E. Gobbi, Estela Raffaele

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Environmental Science 3 23%
Unspecified 2 15%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,436,760
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#2,349
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,575
of 334,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#36
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.