| Title |
Efficient pairing computation on supersingular Abelian varieties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10623-006-9033-6 |
| Authors |
Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, Steven D. Galbraith, Colm Ó’ hÉigeartaigh, Michael Scott |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 37% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 35 | 65% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#44
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,131
of 77,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them