↓ Skip to main content

Omarthrose: Pathogenese, Diagnostik und konservative Therapieoptionen

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Omarthrose: Pathogenese, Diagnostik und konservative Therapieoptionen
Published in
Die Orthopädie, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00132-018-3542-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Mehl, A. B. Imhoff, K. Beitzel

Abstract

Osteoarthritis of the shoulder is characterized by a progressive degenerative process, which is based on chronic inflammation with intra-articular release of different cytokines and proteolytic enzymes. The main predisposing factors are a history of trauma or surgery, as well as chronic overuse or instability of the glenohumeral joint. Affected patients especially suffer from impaired joint function and pain, which are often associated with cognitive and psychosocial restrictions. Possible co-pathologies have to be evaluated carefully both clinically and radiologically as they must be taken into account in the therapeutic procedure. If arthroplasty of the shoulder is planned, a pre-operative CT scan is mandatory in order to evaluate the bone stock of the glenoid, which has a decisive influence on the choice of implant. Conservative treatment options are oral pain medication, physical therapy, and intra-articular injections, whereby, in comparison to corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid seems to be advantageous especially with respect to the duration of a positive clinical effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#189
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,956
of 344,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.