| Title |
Periazetabuläre Osteotomie – Welchen Einfluss hat das Alter auf patientenrelevante Ergebnisse?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-017-3523-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Franken, F. Thielemann, A. Postler, S. Blum, A. Hartmann, K.-P. Günther, J. Goronzy |
| Abstract |
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective procedure in treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. To achieve a good outcome a strict patient selection has to be applied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of patient age at surgery on clinical outcome. In a prospective study 86 patients (106 hips) underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up at a mean time of 5 years (2.5-8.5 years) after PAO. Patient-related outcome measurements (PROMs: EQ-5D, WOMAC, OHS, GTO) were applied preoperatively as well as postoperatively and the deformity correction as well as development of osteoarthritis were evaluated. In order to analyze the influence of patient age at surgery on clinical outcome, we subdivided the patient cohort into four different age groups (<20 years, 20-29 years, 30-39 years, >40 years). Of the patients 90% were very satisfied or satisfied with the results 5 years after surgery, and in all age groups PROMs significantly increased. Even though preoperative as well as postoperative algofunction declined in cohorts with increasing age, the overall benefit as measured in WOMAC and EQ-5D scores was equal in all age groups. Increasing age is associated with a progression in osteoarthritis as well as a higher conversion rate to total arthroplasty. Age is an important influencing factor on the long-term outcome after PAO. A certain age as cut off for indications could not be identified in this study. Even patients in the age groups 30-39 years and > 40 years showed PROM improvement and satisfaction with outcome at medium-term follow-up. The expected success rate has to be discussed preoperatively with the patient; however, as a higher conversion rate to hip arthroplasty as well as progressive osteoarthritis is associated with higher age, not only patient age alone but also morphological characteristics of the hip joint have to be taken into consideration. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#394,699
of 454,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.