↓ Skip to main content

Joint-preserving treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Joint-preserving treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears
Published in
Die Orthopädie, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00132-017-3516-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Valenti

Abstract

An irreparable cuff tear is defined as the inability to achieve direct repair of native tendon to the great tuberosity despite intra- and extra-articular release of the remaining tissue. Three distinct anatomic patterns are identified: posterosuperior cuff tears which involve the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor; anterosuperior tears which involve the supraspinatus and subscapularis; and global tears which comprise both. Subacromial debridement and tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head of the biceps are proposed for older patients with a functional but very painful shoulder. Partial repair-particularly the infraspinatus and the subscapularis-is indicated for young patients if the muscle is still trophic with a fatty infiltration less than 3. It can be combined with a tendon transfer. In irreparable posterosuperior tears, latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius transfer has been reported to improve active elevation and external rotation. In anterosuperior cuff tears, pectoralis major or latissimus transfer has been used. If the lack of external rotation is isolated with good active forward elevation, the L'Episcopo procedure is the procedure of choice. New techniques with a short follow-up have been proposed recently: implantation of a balloon-shaped, biodegradable spacer in the subacromial space to maintain the position of the humeral head and to facilitate deltoid action; capsular superior reconstruction with a fascia lata or an artificial graft implanted between the superior glenoid rim and the great tuberosity to reproduce the natural capsule of the supra- and infraspinatus and to stabilize the humeral head.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 21 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 21 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390,915
of 450,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.