| Title |
Recent experiences with minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair “nuss procedure”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11748-005-0047-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald Nuss |
| Abstract |
To review the new technical modifications and results of 668 patients who have had pectus excavatum repair utilizing the minimally invasive technique. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 54% |
| Engineering | 5 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#40
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,636
of 67,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them