↓ Skip to main content

Role of the leukemia-inhibitory factor gene mutations in infertile women: The embryo-endometrial cytokine cross talk during implantation — a delicate homeostatic equilibrium

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Role of the leukemia-inhibitory factor gene mutations in infertile women: The embryo-endometrial cytokine cross talk during implantation — a delicate homeostatic equilibrium
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/bf02931563
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Králíčková, P. Šíma, Z. Rokyta

Abstract

Locally secreted cytokines of both the embryonic and the endometrial origin control the implantation process. The defects in their signaling that lead to unfavorable environment within the uterus may cause embryo implantation failure. The leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), interleukin-11 (IL-11) as well as IL-12/IL-15/IL-18 system are regarded to be important signaling vectors. LIF plays an essential role in the preimplantation embryo development and the blastocyst implantation and its gene mutations in women contribute to the implantation failure and subsequent infertility. IL-11 signaling has been shown to be required for the uterine decidualization response as well as for the hatching and attachment of blastocysts. The IL-12/IL-15/IL-18 system interacts with endometrial leukocytes, particularly with NK cells, and influences directly the local angiogenesis and tissue remodeling. Differences in the levels of endometrial leukocytic subpopulations and in the patterns of intra-uterine cytokine concentrations that are observed between fertile and infertile women contribute to infertility probably by affecting the embryonic maternal dialogue during the implantation and early placentation period. Focusing on this cross talk promises to open new era in assisted reproduction techniques that will be based on diagnostics of missing signaling molecules and impairments of uterine receptivity as well as on therapeutic applications of individualized embryo culture and transfer media.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#126
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,338
of 58,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.