↓ Skip to main content

Current management of pelvic organ prolapse in aging women: EMAS clinical guide

Overview of attention for article published in Maturitas, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current management of pelvic organ prolapse in aging women: EMAS clinical guide
Published in
Maturitas, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Giannini, Eleonora Russo, Antonio Cano, Peter Chedraui, Dimitrios G Goulis, Irene Lambrinoudaki, Patrice Lopes, Gita Mishra, Alfred Mueck, Margaret Rees, Levent M Senturk, John C Stevenson, Petra Stute, Pauliina Tuomikoski, Tommaso Simoncini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Master 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 42 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 43 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,322,058
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#644
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,316
of 452,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.