| Title |
Does MCDA Trump CEA?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-018-0373-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Campillo-Artero, Jaume Puig-Junoy, Anthony J. Culyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Ireland | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Kenya | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 27% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,390,692
of 24,733,536 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#91
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,925
of 336,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,733,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.