↓ Skip to main content

Care-‘less’: exploring the interface between child care and parental control in the context of child rights for workers in children’s homes in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Care-‘less’: exploring the interface between child care and parental control in the context of child rights for workers in children’s homes in Ghana
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12914-018-0151-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernest Darkwah, Marguerite Daniel, Joana Salifu Yendork

Abstract

This study explored how employed caregivers experience the interface between child care, parental control and child rights in the context of Children's Homes in Ghana. The focus was on investigating caregiver perceptions of proper child care, their experiences with having to work with child rights principles and the implication of these for their relationships with the children and the care services they deliver. Adopting a qualitative approach with phenomenological design, data were collected from 41 caregivers in two children's homes in Ghana using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. It emerged that caregivers experienced frustrations with perceived limitations that child rights principles place on their control over the children describing it as lessening and, at the same time, complicating the care services they provide. The findings suggest a need for a review of the implementation strategies of the child rights approach in that context. A re-organization of the children's homes environment and re-orientation of caregivers and children regarding their relationship is also suggested.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 20 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 16%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,062
of 17,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,447
of 344,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#197
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.