| Title |
Carbon dioxide in magmas and implications for hydrothermal systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mineralium Deposita, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001260100185 |
| Authors |
Jacob B. Lowenstern |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 302 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 26% |
| Researcher | 80 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 227 | 73% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Mineralium Deposita
#64
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,891
of 42,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralium Deposita
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them