↓ Skip to main content

The Immunologic Paradoxes of IgG4-Related Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The Immunologic Paradoxes of IgG4-Related Disease
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12016-018-8679-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Xiao, Min Lian, Weici Zhang, M. Eric Gershwin, Xiong Ma

Abstract

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), which usually occurs in middle-aged and elderly men, is a newly recognized fibroinflammatory condition characterized by swelling and sclerosis of involved organs, increased IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration in lesions, and elevated IgG4 concentration in serum. Despite growing interest in the research, the pathophysiological mechanism remains elusive. Most IgG4-RD patients respond well to steroid therapy initially, but recurrent and refractory cases are common, especially in advanced fibrotic stage. Recent studies have documented the heterogeneity of the B cell lineages, which suggests their multiple functions in IgG4-RD beyond IgG4 production, such as cytokine secretion, antigen presentation, autoantibody production, and modulation of T and B cell interactions. Thus, a critical balance exists between pathogenic and regulatory B subsets to prevent immunopathology. A prompt response to B cell depletion therapy reported in recent cases strongly suggests the imbalance within B cell lineages in IgG4-RD. A more precise understanding of the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD will open up new perspectives for therapeutic strategy. With a particular emphasis on the novel B cell-targeted therapeutic strategies, this review highlights the immunologic features of IgG4-RD and the possible roles of B cell lineages in the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,729,845
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#503
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,468
of 334,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.