↓ Skip to main content

The SLC24 Na+/Ca2+-K+ exchanger family: vision and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
The SLC24 Na+/Ca2+-K+ exchanger family: vision and beyond
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00424-003-1069-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul P. M. Schnetkamp

Abstract

Na(+)/Ca(2+)-K(+) exchange (NCKX) was first discovered in the outer segments of vertebrate rod photoreceptors (ROS), where it is the only mechanism for extruding the Ca(2+) that enters ROS via the light-sensitive and cGMP-gated channels. ROS NCKX1 is the only NCKX gene family member studied extensively in situ. ROS NCKX1 cDNAs have been cloned subsequently from a number of species including man and shown to be the first member of a new gene family ( SLCA24). Three further members of the human NCKX gene family have been cloned subsequently ( NCKX2- 4) by homology with NCKX1, while a partial sequence of a fifth human NCKX gene has appeared in the data base. NCKX-related genes have also been identified in lower animals including fruit flies, worms and sea urchins. NCKX2 is expressed in the brain, in retinal cone photoreceptors and in retinal ganglion cells, while NCKX3 and NCKX4 show a broader expression pattern. In situ NCKX1 and heterologously expressed NCKX2 operate at a 4Na(+):1Ca(2+)+1 K(+) stoichiometry; both NCKX1 and NCKX2 are bidirectional transporters normally extruding Ca(2+) from the cell (forward exchange), but also able to carry Ca(2+) into the cell (reverse exchange) when the transmembrane Na(+) gradient is reversed. Sequence changes have been observed for both NCKX1 and NCKX2 in patients with retinal diseases, but a definitive association with retinal disease has not been shown.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Professor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#513
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,796
of 54,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.