↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation sequencing is a robust strategy for the high-throughput detection of zygosity in transgenic maize

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Next-generation sequencing is a robust strategy for the high-throughput detection of zygosity in transgenic maize
Published in
Transgenic Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11248-015-9864-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie Fritsch, Rainer Fischer, Christoph Wambach, Max Dudek, Stefan Schillberg, Florian Schröper

Abstract

Simple and reliable, high-throughput techniques to detect the zygosity of transgenic events in plants are valuable for biotechnology and plant breeding companies seeking robust genotyping data for the assessment of new lines and the monitoring of breeding programs. We show that next-generation sequencing (NGS) applied to short PCR products spanning the transgene integration site provides accurate zygosity data that are more robust and reliable than those generated by PCR-based methods. The NGS reads covered the 5' border of the transgenic events (incorporating part of the transgene and the flanking genomic DNA), or the genomic sequences flanking the unfilled transgene integration site at the wild-type locus. We compared the NGS method to competitive real-time PCR with transgene-specific and wild-type-specific primer/probe pairs, one pair matching the 5' genomic flanking sequence and 5' part of the transgene and the other matching the unfilled transgene integration site. Although both NGS and real-time PCR provided useful zygosity data, the NGS technique was favorable because it needed fewer optimization steps. It also provided statistically more-reliable evidence for the presence of each allele because each product was often covered by more than 100 reads. The NGS method is also more suitable for the genotyping of large panels of plants because up to 80 million reads can be produced in one sequencing run. Our novel method is therefore ideal for the rapid and accurate genotyping of large numbers of samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,320,094
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#715
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,629
of 352,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.