| Title |
PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-002-1601-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Slater, Frank Shann, Gale Pearson, for the PIM Study Group |
| Abstract |
To revise the Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) to adjust for improvement in the outcome of paediatric intensive care. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 352 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 14% |
| Other | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 86 | 24% |
| Unknown | 70 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 215 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 83 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,272,020
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,903
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,688
of 128,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.