↓ Skip to main content

The sensitivity of ecosystem service models to choices of input data and spatial resolution

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The sensitivity of ecosystem service models to choices of input data and spatial resolution
Published in
Applied Geography, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.005
Authors

Kenneth J. Bagstad, Erika Cohen, Zachary H. Ancona, Steven G. McNulty, Ge Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 7%
Engineering 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 58 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,300,178
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#361
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,134
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.