You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of a Device to Narrow the Coronary Sinus in Refractory Angina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1402556 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Verheye, E Marc Jolicœur, Miles W Behan, Thomas Pettersson, Paul Sainsbury, Jonathan Hill, Mathias Vrolix, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Thomas Engstrom, Marino Labinaz, Ranil de Silva, Marc Schwartz, Nathalie Meyten, Neal G Uren, Serge Doucet, Jean-François Tanguay, Steven Lindsay, Timothy D Henry, Christopher J White, Elazer R Edelman, Shmuel Banai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Argentina | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 27% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 17% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 85 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#199,934
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,873
of 32,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,269
of 362,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#40
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.