↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical evidence for somatotopic maps in the zona incerta of rats

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Anatomical evidence for somatotopic maps in the zona incerta of rats
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00429-002-0280-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Shaw, John Mitrofanis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#675
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,509
of 56,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them