↓ Skip to main content

Age-related morphologic changes of the central canal of the human spinal cord

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Age-related morphologic changes of the central canal of the human spinal cord
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, February 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004010050982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keizo Yasui, Yoshio Hashizume, Mari Yoshida, Takashi Kameyama, G. Sobue

Abstract

To elucidate the role of the human central canal on the physiology and pathogenesis of acquired syringomyelia, we analyzed the age-related morphologic changes in the normal human central canal of the spinal cord. The subjects included 158 autopsy cases ranging in age from 1 week postnatally to 116 years of age. Each segment of the whole spinal cords was investigated from the C3 to S3 levels. The microscopic pictures of the central canal were classified as patent or occluded at each level for each age decade. The patency rate under 1 year of age was 100% in almost all the segments, which markedly decreased in the second decade, and the canals were occluded in all the segments with advancing age. According to the longitudinal pattern of the central canal occlusion, 19 of 20 cases where the canals were patent in all segment levels were less than 10 years of age. Cases in which the canals were occluded in all segment levels appeared in the second decade, and their number increased gradually with advancing age. The occlusion of the central canal started at the T6 and L5 to S2 levels. We suggest that the central canal does not function after infancy because of its occlusion, and that it is not involved in the development of syringomyelia in adult patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,519
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,693
of 102,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.