↓ Skip to main content

Boolean negation and all that

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Boolean negation and all that
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00263541
Authors

Graham Priest

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 41%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 9 53%
Linguistics 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#64
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,647
of 16,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them