↓ Skip to main content

Logic of paradox revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Logic of paradox revisited
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00453020
Authors

Graham Priest

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Germany 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 35%
Researcher 7 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 16 47%
Mathematics 5 15%
Computer Science 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Linguistics 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#64
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,384
of 8,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them