| Title |
NDVI spatial pattern and its differentiation on the Mongolian Plateau
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geographical Sciences, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11442-009-0403-7 |
| Authors |
Xueyan Zhang, Yunfeng Hu, Dafang Zhuang, Yongqing Qi, Xin Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geographical Sciences
#11
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,618
of 102,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geographical Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them