↓ Skip to main content

The solar WIND and suprathermal ion composition investigation on the WIND spacecraft

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
The solar WIND and suprathermal ion composition investigation on the WIND spacecraft
Published in
Space Science Reviews, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00751327
Authors

G. Gloeckler, H. Balsiger, A. Bürgi, P. Bochsler, L. A. Fisk, A. B. Galvin, J. Geiss, F. Gliem, D. C. Hamilton, T. E. Holzer, D. Hovestadt, F. M. Ipavich, E. Kirsch, R. A. Lundgren, K. W. Ogilvie, R. B. Sheldon, B. Wilken

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 61%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#464
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,337
of 76,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.