| Title |
Bench-to-bedside review: Pulmonary–renal syndromes – an update for the intensivist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc5778 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Spyros A Papiris, Effrosyni D Manali, Ioannis Kalomenidis, Giorgios E Kapotsis, Anna Karakatsani, Charis Roussos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Honduras | 1 | 7% |
| Sudan | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 23% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 28% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 150 | 78% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,817,933
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,275
of 6,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,651
of 86,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.