| Title |
On projected newton barrier methods for linear programming and an equivalence to Karmarkar’s projective method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mathematical Programming, June 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02592025 |
| Authors |
Philip E. Gill, Walter Murray, Michael A. Saunders, J. A. Tomlin, Margaret H. Wright |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 329 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 21% |
| Researcher | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 25 | 7% |
| Engineering | 25 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 116 | 33% |
| Unknown | 52 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#148
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,008
of 11,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.