↓ Skip to main content

Effect of broad- and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials on Clostridium difficile and microbial diversity in a model of the distal colon

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
18 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of broad- and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials on Clostridium difficile and microbial diversity in a model of the distal colon
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1001224107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary C. Rea, Alleson Dobson, Orla O'Sullivan, Fiona Crispie, Fiona Fouhy, Paul D. Cotter, Fergus Shanahan, Barry Kiely, Colin Hill, R. Paul Ross

Abstract

Vancomycin, metronidazole, and the bacteriocin lacticin 3147 are active against a wide range of bacterial species, including Clostridium difficile. We demonstrate that, in a human distal colon model, the addition of each of the three antimicrobials resulted in a significant decrease in numbers of C. difficile. However, their therapeutic use in the gastrointestinal tract may be compromised by their broad spectrum of activity, which would be expected to significantly impact on other members of the human gut microbiota. We used high-throughput pyrosequencing to compare the effect of each antimicrobial on the composition of the microbiota. All three treatments resulted in a decrease in the proportion of sequences assigned to the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, with a corresponding increase in those assigned to members of the Proteobacteria. One possible means of avoiding such "collateral damage" would involve the application of a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial with specific anti-C. difficile activity. We tested this hypothesis using thuricin CD, a narrow-spectrum bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis, which is active against C. difficile. The results demonstrated that this bacteriocin was equally effective at killing C. difficile in the distal colon model but had no significant impact on the composition of the microbiota. This offers the possibility of developing a targeted approach to eliminating C. difficile in the colon, without collateral damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Denmark 4 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 349 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 8%
Chemistry 13 4%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 71 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,346,071
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#35,230
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,889
of 107,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#233
of 712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.