↓ Skip to main content

Weitere Beiträge zur traumatisch-mechanischen Entstehung der „spontanen” Knorpelablösungen (sogen. Osteochondritis dissecans)

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, May 1922
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Weitere Beiträge zur traumatisch-mechanischen Entstehung der „spontanen” Knorpelablösungen (sogen. Osteochondritis dissecans)
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, May 1922
DOI 10.1007/bf02812921
Authors

Max Kappis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 33%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#315
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them