↓ Skip to main content

The BRCA2 c.68‐7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The BRCA2 c.68‐7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity
Published in
Human Mutation, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/humu.23411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mara Colombo, Irene Lòpez‐Perolio, Huong D. Meeks, Laura Caleca, Michael T. Parsons, Hongyan Li, Giovanna De Vecchi, Emma Tudini, Claudia Foglia, Patrizia Mondini, Siranoush Manoukian, Raquel Behar, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Alfons Meindl, Marco Montagna, Dieter Niederacher, Ane Y. Schmidt, Liliana Varesco, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Manjeet K. Bolla, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Qin Wang, Kristiina Aittomäki, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton‐Culver, Volker Arndt, Matthias W. Beckmann, Alicia Beeghly‐Fadel, Javier Benitez, Bram Boeckx, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Bernardo Bonanni, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Barbara Burwinkel, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Don M. Conroy, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Mikael Eriksson, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Marike Gabrielson, Montserrat García‐Closas, Graham G. Giles, Anna González‐Neira, Pascal Guénel, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Mikael Hartman, Jan Hauke, Antoinette Hollestelle, John L. Hopper, Anna Jakubowska, Audrey Jung, Veli‐Matti Kosma, Diether Lambrechts, Loid Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Jan Lubinski, Arto Mannermaa, Sara Margolin, Hui Miao, Roger L. Milne, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Janet E. Olson, Paolo Peterlongo, Julian Peto, Katri Pylkäs, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Mee Hoong See, Melissa C. Southey, Anthony Swerdlow, Soo H. Teo, Amanda E. Toland, Ian Tomlinson, Thérèse Truong, Christi J. van Asperen, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland, Lizet E. van der Kolk, Robert Winqvist, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Wei Zheng, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton, Alex Henderson, Frans B.L. Hogervorst, Louise Izatt, Kenneth Offitt, Lucy E. Side, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Study EMBRACE, Study HEBON, Lesley McGuffog, Antonis C. Antoniou, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench, Amanda B. Spurdle, David E. Goldgar, Miguel de la Hoya, Paolo Radice

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,858,475
of 29,695,593 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#274
of 3,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,290
of 351,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,695,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.