↓ Skip to main content

Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
381 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
Title
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ring T. Cardé, Mark A. Willis

Abstract

Insects locate many resources important to survival by tracking along wind-borne odor plumes to their source. It is well known that plumes are patchy distributions of high concentration packets of odor interspersed with clean air, not smooth Gaussian distributions of odor intensity. This realization has been crucial to our understanding of plume-tracking behavior, because insect locomotory movements and sensory processing typically take place in the range of tens to hundreds of milliseconds, permitting them to respond to the rapid changes in odor concentration they experience in plumes. Because odor plumes are not comprised of smooth concentration gradients, they cannot provide the directional information necessary to allow plume-tracking insects to steer toward the source. Many experiments have shown that, in the species examined, successful source location requires two sensory inputs: the presence of the attractive odor and the detection of the direction of the wind bearing that odor. All plume-tracking insects use the wind direction as the primary directional cue that enables them to steer their movements toward the odor source. Experimental manipulations of the presence and absence of the odor, and the presence, absence, or direction of the wind during plume tracking, have begun to resolve the relationship between these two sensory inputs and how they shape the maneuvers we observe. Experiments, especially those undertaken in the natural wind and odor environments of the organisms in question and those directed at understanding the neural processing that underlie plume tracking, promise to enhance our understanding of this remarkable behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 367 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 23%
Researcher 86 22%
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 48 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 213 53%
Neuroscience 30 8%
Engineering 26 7%
Environmental Science 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 62 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#300
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,750
of 82,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.