↓ Skip to main content

Proprioceptive input resets central locomotor rhythm in the spinal cat

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, November 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
500 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Proprioceptive input resets central locomotor rhythm in the spinal cat
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, November 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00249807
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. A. Conway, H. Hultborn, O. Kiehn

Abstract

The reflex regulation of stepping is an important factor in adapting the step cycle to changes in the environment. The present experiments have examined the influence of muscle proprioceptors on centrally generated rhythmic locomotor activity in decerebrate unanesthetized cats with a spinal transection at Th12. Fictive locomotion, recorded as alternating activity in hindlimb flexor and extensor nerves, was induced by administration of nialamide (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor) and L-DOPA. Brief electrical stimulation of group I afferents from knee and ankle extensors were effective in resetting fictive locomotion in a coordinated fashion. An extensor group I volley delivered during a flexor burst would abruptly terminate the flexor activity and initiate an extensor burst. The same stimulus given during an extensor burst prolonged the extensor activity while delaying the appearance of the following flexor burst. Intracellular recordings from motoneurones revealed that these actions were mediated at premotoneuronal levels resulting from a distribution of inhibition to centres generating flexor bursts and excitation of centres generating extensor bursts. These results indicate that extensor group I afferents have access to central rhythm generators and suggest that this may be of importance in the reflex regulation of stepping. Experiments utilizing natural stimulation of muscle receptors demonstrate that the group I input to the rhythm generators arises mainly from Golgi tendon organ Ib afferents. Thus an increased load of limb extensors during the stance phase would enhance and prolong extensor activity while simultaneously delaying the transition to the swing phase of the step cycle.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 19%
Engineering 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Unspecified 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,050,118
of 24,187,594 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#953
of 3,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,743
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them