↓ Skip to main content

An interview with Bernard Weiner

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
An interview with Bernard Weiner
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02160679
Authors

Janna Siegel, Michael F. Shaughnessy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Linguistics 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#385
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,296
of 27,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them