↓ Skip to main content

Stem cell-based tissue engineering in veterinary orthopaedics

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 2,279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Stem cell-based tissue engineering in veterinary orthopaedics
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00441-011-1316-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter Brehm, Janina Burk, Uta Delling, Claudia Gittel, Iris Ribitsch

Abstract

Regenerative medicine is one of the most intensively researched medical branches, with enormous progress every year. When it comes to translating research from bench to bedside, many of the pioneering innovations are achieved by cooperating teams of human and veterinary medical scientists. The veterinary profession has an important role to play in this new and evolving technology, holding a great scientific potential, because animals serve widely as models for human medicine and results obtained from animals may serve as preclinical results for human medicine. Regenerative veterinary medicine utilizing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) for the treatment of acute injuries as well as chronic disorders is gradually turning into clinical routine. As orthopaedic disorders represent a major part of all cases in veterinary clinical practice, it is not surprising that they are currently taking a leading role in MSC therapies. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to give an overview on past and current achievements as well as future perspectives in stem cell-based tissue engineering in veterinary orthopaedics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,265,733
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#39
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,854
of 251,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.